|
Notable Quote on War |
| "Why
of course the people don't want war ... But after all it
is
the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and
it is always a simple matter to drag the people along,
whether
it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament,
or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the
people
can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That
is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being
attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism
and exposing the country to danger."
Hermann
Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after
World War II
|
|
 |
 |
Wanderers
tend to love globes. I have several. The one in front of me at the moment
satisfies many senses at once--its tactile surface is bathed in a warm
glow from the lamp inside, the oceans uncharacteristically rendered in
the color of old parchment.
I run my
fingers over a surface pocked with the ridges of great mountain ranges,
a wanderer's braille that sets my mind reeling with images of rugged folk
scratching a living from the arid steppes.
There are
many exotic places I haven't been that I make note of, places where civilizations
have flourished and then died, leaving traces in the dust: a burnished
pot sherd here, fragment of whittled bone there.
My fingers
trace mountains that separate countries, rock fences that keep warrior
factions at bay, allowing the long periods of peace crucial for civilization
to flourish. I let the exotic, biblical words flow off my lips: The Tigris,
Euphrates, Baghdad, the fertile plains where people grew to become us.
My fingers
trace eastward toward ever more exotic lands, ending on the enigma that
is a country whose mountain ranges are central, a backbone rather than
a fence: Afghanistan, the Hindukush, the "indiankiller." Kabul
lies arrogantly within the Hindukush where fierce tribes rumbled through,
often repelled by the rugged mountain people who've scratched out a living
here forever.
You see,
when I travel I often turn away from the gaudiness of great public landmarks
produced at public expense in favor of watching people getting on with
their daily lives. I especially draw great pleasure at watching people
using processes long forgotten in the U.S.: A man making brooms on the
veranda of his thatched-roof hut in Nicaragua; a knot of cackling Sardinian
women stirring an enormous pot of bubbling pink sugar with canoe paddles,
sugars extracted painstakingly from pulp of the ripe prickly pears they've
harvested from the cactus fences marking the island's ancient sheep paths.
And the
point of all this? Soon, it is rumored, my President will tell us
that there is no use following the current dissarmament process
any longer, no use in negotiating a meaningful
peace--that
once again it will be necessary to spew ordinance across the plains
where
the Tigris and Euphrates almost touch.
This saddens
me. It is not a political sadness but a deeply felt sense of impending
loss: A country where people came together to create the first cities
will be poisoned and pockmarked in my name. And I don't like it.
"Tough
crap," you are likely to reply, and it is your right, especially
if such an action as a preemptive strike makes you feel safer. It is indeed
selfish of me to worry about peasants and pot sherds and fat fingers tracing
lines in the dust on an old globe. After all, the target of all this likely
ruckus is a single, powerful man who has been known to poison his own
people; I do not sing praises to his name.
It is this
nightmare that I see in my mind: Dead Kurds, civilians poisoned and strung
out along a roadway that is mostly blowing dust. But that nightmare continues
with the vision of thousands of children dead from the lack of drinkable
water, a disgrace that's been going on since the U.S. bombing of the treatment
plants and sewage systems during the Gulf war and continues with sanctions
that don't allow repair materials into Iraq.
Perhaps it
is too much to ask that a government sweat and toil to create a meaningful
peace while making a good example of its compassion for people in foreign
lands. Perhaps it is wrong to think that politicians should be required
to travel to distant lands to see how people live and toil and make friends.
Perhaps I am wrong to think that anyone among us who goes through life
taking punches at anyone who might punch first is using a bad
strategy for safety. But this is a new world. The old one has passed me
by. Cheeks just don't turn like they used to.
No, the majority
is right. Safety is paramount. We can and will wipe out all evil from
our isolated perch on the edge of the frightening world. And someday,
perhaps soon, I imagine our children will be able to travel risk-free
over this radioactive, bomb-pocked world and be inspired at its glorious
emptiness, its pristine moral perfection purchased for a song.
But don't
worry, you will likely find a McDonalds somewhere nearby.
| Got
a question about travel in Europe? Why not post it in our forum?
You can read messages as a guest, but you'll need to be a member
to post. It's a simple sign-up.
Previous
Features
|
|
|